THERMAL ANNEALING - INDUCED CHANGES IN POLYETHERSULFONE (PES) MEMBRANES: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND FLUX CHARACTERIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59957/jctm.v61.i6.2026.8Keywords:
Keywords: low temperature, mechanical strength, thermal annealing, polyethersulfone membrane, water flux.Abstract
Polyethersulfone (PES) membranes are known for their outstanding chemical and thermal resistance, making them suitable for various separation processes. However, enhancement in mechanical properties anremaination efficiency remains necessary for achieving optimal membrane functionality. This study investigates the influence of thermal annealing treatment at low temperature of 60°C and 70°C on the morphology, chemical structure, mechanical performance, and pure water flux of PES membranes, compared to none - thermal annealing membranes. Commercial membranes were subjected to thermal treatment for 60 s using a laboratory oven. Characterization techniques included Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT - IR) for functional group analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for morphological assessment, tensile testing for mechanical evaluation, and dead - end filtration for pure water flux measurement. None - thermal annealing membranes exhibited a tensile strength of 7 MPa, elongation of 43 %, and a water flux of 100 LMH. Annealing at 60°C enhanced pore compactness and uniformity, increasing tensile strength to 9 MPa, elongation to 50 %, and flux to 125 LMH. In contrast, treatment at 70°C further increased water flux to approximately 300 LMH but reduced tensile strength to 6 MPa and elongation to 37 %, indicating a more rigid and brittle structure. FT - IR analysis confirmed no chemical degradation, with enhanced hydrophilic group intensities suggesting improved molecular orientation due to the thermal treatment. The results demonstrate that thermal annealing, particularly at 60°C, can effectively improve PES membrane performance relative to none - thermal annealing membranes while preserving structural integrity, offering a practical approach for advanced membrane - based separation technologies.
References
M. Elma et al., “Hollow fiber membrane technology applied for oily wastewater and wetland water treatment: a review,” vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1073–1102, 2024, doi: doi:10.1515/revce-2023-0048.
Muthia Elma et al., “Polysulfone Hollow Fiber Membrane Mixed with Peat Clay Particles: Fabrication and Properties,” 2024.
M Mahmud et al., “Step-by-Step Fabrication of PVDF-TiO2 Hollow Fiber Membrane and Its Application Desalination of Wetland Saline Water via Pervaporation,” Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 499–516, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.17509/ijost.v8i3.63433.
M. Maryudi, D. C. Hakika, and A. Amillia, “Morphology and selected properties of cellulose acetate membranes for environmental applications,” Polimery/Polymers, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 292–299, 2024, doi: 10.14314/polimery.2024.5.2.
M. Maryudi, D. C. Hakika, F. M. A. Chusna, and A. Amillia, “Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate propionate membrane,” International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 887, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijaas.v13.i4.pp887-895.
A. Amillia et al., “Treatment of Textile Industrial Wastewater using Membrane Technology: A Review,” CHEESA: Chemical Engineering Research Articles, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 90–102, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.25273/cheesa.v7i2.19132.90-102.
R. A. Lestari et al., “Organo Silica Membranes for Wetland Saline Water Desalination: Effect of membranes calcination temperatures,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 148, 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014807006.
Lestari Riani Ayu ; et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Polysulfone/Peat Clay Hollow Fiber Membranes: The Effect of Composition and Morphology,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 86–105, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.126.2.86105.
H. Cui et al., “Facile fabrication of tight polyethersulfone-based ultrafiltration membranes for dye/salt separation via phase separation,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 376, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133935.
S. Ashok Kumar, G. Srinivasan, and S. Govindaradjane, “Development of a new blended polyethersulfone membrane for dye removal from synthetic wastewater,” Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag., vol. 12, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100238.
K. E. Mokubung, N. N. Madzivha, W. J. Lau, and E. N. Nxumalo, “Polyethersulfone/biochar-Fe3O4/GO mixed matrix membranes with enhanced antifouling properties for heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage,” Inorg. Chem. Commun., vol. 176, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2025.114190.
A. E. Mahdi et al., “Preparation, characterization and applications of polyethersulfone/bentonite clay composite for protein removal,” Desalination Water Treat., vol. 320, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100653.
M. Wasyłeczko, C. Wojciechowski, and A. Chwojnowski, “Polyethersulfone Polymer for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 37–42, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25084233.
E. S. Mansor, E. A. Ali, and A. M. Shaban, “Tight ultrafiltration polyethersulfone membrane for cheese whey wastewater treatment,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 407, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127175.
Y. Chen et al., “Performance evaluation of a polyethersulfone composite ultrafiltration membrane for oily wastewater purification,” Desalination Water Treat., vol. 315, pp. 122–130, 2023, doi: 10.5004/dwt.2023.30118.
M. Mahmoudian and M. G. Kochameshki, “The performance of polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane in the removal of industrial dyes,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 224, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123693.
N. C. Homem et al., “Surface modification of a polyethersulfone microfiltration membrane with graphene oxide for reactive dyes removal,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 486, pp. 499–507, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.276.
Y. A. Sihombing, M. Z. E. Sinaga, R. Hardiyanti, Susilawati, I. R. Saragi, and Rangga, “Preparation, characterization, and desalination study of polystyrene membrane integrated with zeolite using the electrospinning method,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4–9, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10113.
H. Mokarizadeh and A. Raisi, “Industrial wastewater treatment using PES UF membranes containing hydrophilic additives: Experimental and modeling of fouling mechanism,” Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 23, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101701.
S. Mulyati et al., “Enhancing polyethersulfone membrane durability and stability through Eco-friendly green silica from natural kaolin for water treatment applications,” Results in Engineering, vol. 26, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105340.
B. Harshavardhan, R. Ravishankar, B. Suresha, S. Srinivas, and U. Arun, “Influence of short carbon fiber content on thermal properties of polyethersulfone composites,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, Elsevier Ltd, 2020, pp. 1268–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.769.
S. M. Z. Firouzabadi, L. Naji, and L. Ghadiri, “Comparative study on graphene oxide and sulfonated graphene oxide reinforced polyethersulfone-based cation-exchange membrane,” Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 696, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134392.
R. Almeria Ragio et al., “Performance comparison of modified polyethersulfone membrane with graphene oxide and molybdenum disulfide for effective filtration of urban surface water,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 356, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130001.
E. Gadallah et al., “Novel Polyethersulfone membrane incorporating Zr-MOF/biomass-derived activated hydrochar composites for enhanced permeability, selectivity, and antifouling properties,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 363, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132288.
E. Gadallah, J. Chen, M. N. Khalil, S. Karam, and F. Li, “A novel polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane with enhanced permeability and antifouling ability via melamine-modified metal-organic framework,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 63, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105438.
K. M. Shabeeb et al., “Novel partially cross-linked nanoparticles graft co-polymer as pore former for polyethersulfone membranes for dyes removal,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21958.
C. Liu, Y. Sun, Z. Chen, and S. Zhang, “From ultrafiltration to nanofiltration: Nanofiltration membrane fabricated by a combined process of chemical crosslinking and thermal annealing,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 212, pp. 465–473, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.041.
Y. Feng et al., “Effect of thermal annealing on gas separation performance and aggregation structures of block polyimide membranes,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 219, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123538.
X. Xu et al., “Thermal treatment effects on separation performance and plasticization resistance of polyimide and PIM-1 membranes,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 720, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2025.123792.
A. Jullin et al., “Influence of the process on water permeability of semi-crystalline PLA nanocomposites: solvent casting versus annealing of melt-blended films,” Polym. Test., vol. 149, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108862.
W. Feng, J. Li, C. Fang, L. Zhang, and L. Zhu, “Controllable thermal annealing of polyimide membranes for highly-precise organic solvent nanofiltration,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 643, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120013.
C. Yin et al., “Thermal annealing on free volumes, crystallinity and proton conductivity of Nafion membranes,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 120, pp. 71–78, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.04.028.
L. D. Fiorentin-Ferrari, K. M. Celant, B. C. Gonçalves, S. M. Teixeira, V. Slusarski-Santana, and A. N. Módenes, “Fabrication and characterization of polysulfone and polyethersulfone membranes applied in the treatment of fish skin tanning effluent,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 294, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126127.
M. Hajibeygi, N. Habibnejad, M. Shabanian, and H. A. Khonakdar, “Phosphorus‐containing Polyamide Mg(OH)2 Nanocomposite Coating on Surface of Poly(vinyl Chloride) Thin Film: Study on Thermal Stability, Flammability, and Mechanical Properties,” Polym. Adv. Technol., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2360–2370, 2020, doi: 10.1002/pat.4955.
M. Yong, Y. Zhang, S. Sun, and W. Liu, “Properties of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ultrafiltration membrane improved by lignin: Hydrophilicity and antifouling,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 575, pp. 50–59, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.01.005.
W. Fu et al., “Surface polarity modulation enables high-performance polyamide membranes for separation of polar/non-polar organic solvent mixtures,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 704, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122901.
Z. Y. Liu, X. T. Wu, J. Yan, W. Yang, and M. B. Yang, “Effect of annealing temperature on PP microporous membranes obtained by a melt-extrusion-stretching method,” International Polymer Processing, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 467–474, 2019, doi: 10.3139/217.3774.
M. N. E. Alam, S. A. Deowan, S. S. Efty, F. Chowdhury, A. Haque Milon, and M. Nurnabi, “Fabrication and performance evaluation of polyethersulfone membranes with varying compositions of polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene glycol for textile wastewater treatment using MBR,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 16, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36215.
H. N. Alfalahy and S. M. Al-Jubouri, “Preparation and application of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranincorporating NaX zeolite for lead ions removal from aqueous solutions,” Desalination Water Treat., vol. 248, pp. 149–162, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.5004/dwt.2022.28072.
R. R. Abdullah, K. M. Shabeed, A. B. Alzubaydi, and Q. F. Alsalhy, “Novel photocatalytic polyether sulphone ultrafiltration (UF) membrane reinforced with oxygen-deficient Tungsten Oxide (WO2.89) for Congo red dye removal,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 177, pp. 526–540, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.015.
T. D. Kusworo et al., “Effects of crosslinking and thermal annealing modifications on the performance of nanohybrid PSf-ZnO membranes for the treatment of raw and ozonated petroleum refinery wastewater,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 9, no. 5, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106200.
G. Wang, J. Kang, S. Yang, M. Lu, and H. Wei, “Influence of structure construction on water uptake, swelling, and oxidation stability of proton exchange membranes,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 50, pp. 279–311, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
