ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF AN INNOVATIVE CHLORHEXIDINE-FREE CHILDREN’S MOUTHWASH AGAINST BENEFICIAL AND PATHOGENIC ORAL MICROORGANISMS

Tanya Zalamova; Tanya Nihtyanova; Bogdan Goranov; Ilian Dobrev; Ani Belcheva

doi:10.59957/jctm.v61.i6.2026.3

Authors

Tanya Zalamova Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv
Tanya Nihtyanova Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine Medical University - Plovdiv
Bogdan Goranov Department of Microbiology, University of Food Technologies
Ilian Dobrev Department of Microbiology, University of Food Technologies
Ani Belcheva Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59957/jctm.v61.i6.2026.3

Keywords:

mouthwash, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine-free formulation, oral biofilm, pediatric dentistry, antimicrobial activity

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of an experimentally developed chlorhexidine-free children’s mouthwash against selected beneficial and pathogenic oral microorganisms. The antimicrobial activity of individual components and combined mouthwash formulations was assessed using agar diffusion, direct-contact tests, synchronous cultivation and time-kill assays with mixed microbial suspensions and donor-derived dental plaque. The antimicrobial effect was strain-dependent: Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia showed the highest resistance, whereas Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus salivarius were more susceptible to the tested components. The prototype formulation demonstrated substantial antimicrobial activity against all tested microorganisms. In the direct-contact test, Sample 1 achieved a 57.22 % reduction in viable cells after 90 s of exposure in the mixed pathogen population, compared with 67.91 % for Eludril classic® and 33.90 % for the placebo formulation. The overall bacterial death-rate constant of Sample 1 was lower than that of the chlorhexidine-containing reference product but remained markedly higher than that of the placebo. The tested multicomponent chlorhexidine-free formulation exhibited relevant antimicrobial activity against planktonic and biofilm-associated oral microorganisms, supporting its potential as a well-tolerated adjunct for pediatric preventive oral care.

References

REFERENCES

A. Bollen, Effects of Malocclusions and Orthodontics on Periodontal Health: Evidence from a Systematic Review, J. Dent. Educ., vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 912–918, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.8.tb04567.x.

M. Gehlot, R. Sharma, S. Tewari, D. Kumar, and A. Gupta, “Effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health of periodontally compromised patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 324–332, May 2022, doi: 10.2319/022521-156.1.

M. Sonesson and S. Twetman, Prevention of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: systematic review, Eur. J. Orthod., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 485–490, 2023.

K. C. Julien, P. H. Buschang, and P. M. Campbell, Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment, Angle Orthodontist, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 641–647, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.2319/071712-584.1.

D. Al-Blaihed, O. El Meligy, K. Baghlaf, R. A. Aljawi, and S. Abudawood, White Spot Lesions in Fixed Orthodontics: A Literature Review on Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment, Cureus, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.7759/cureus.65679.

D. Sardana, F. Schwendicke, E. Kosan, and E. Tüfekçi, White spot lesions in orthodontics: consensus statements for prevention and management, Angle Orthodontist, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 621–628, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.2319/062523-440.1.

F. S. Ludovichetti et al., Prevention of White Spot Lesions Induced by Fixed Orthodontic Therapy: A Literature Review, Mar. 01, 2025, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/dj13030103.

H. H. Goh and B. Doubleday, Aids for mechanical cleaning of teeth with fixed braces, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2018, no. 1, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012931.

Z. Marincak Vrankova et al., Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on gingival status and oral microbiota: a pilot study, BMC Oral Health, vol. 22, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02511-9.

X. Ren, Y. Zhang, Y. Xiang, T. Hu, R. Cheng, and H. Cai, The efficacy of mouthwashes on oral microorganisms and gingivitis in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Oral Health, vol. 23, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02920-4.

P. James et al., Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health, Mar. 31, 2017, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2.

V. C. C. Marinho, L. Y. Chong, H. V Worthington, and T. Walsh, Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 7, p. CD002284, 2016, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002284.pub2.

C. G. Jones, Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard?, Periodontology, vol. 15, pp. 55–62, 2000.

D. A. C. Van Strydonck, D. E. Slot, U. Van Der Velden, and F. Van Der Weijden, Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: A systematic review, J. Clin. Periodontol., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1042–1055, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01883.x.

J. C. Gunsolley, Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses, J. Dent., vol. 38, pp. S6–S10, 2010.

S. S. Socransky and A. D. Haffajee, Periodontal microbial ecology Principles of microbial ecology, Periodontol. 2000, vol. 38, pp. 135-187., 2005.

K. A. Pitten FA, Antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinse solutions., E J Clin Pharmacol, vol. 55, pp. 95–100, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.1007/s002280050601.

S. Mohapatra, R. Mohapatra, Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride and essential oil mouthwashes in reducing plaque and gingivitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Evid. Based Dent., vol. 26, May 2025.

M. Sánchez, E. González-Burgos, I. Iglesias, and M. P. Gómez-Serranillos, Pharmacological update properties of aloe vera and its major active constituents, Mar. 02, 2020, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/molecules25061324.

R. A. Joseph et al., Comparative evaluation on the effect of herbal mouthwash on putative periodontal pathogens - In vitro study, Res. J. Pharm. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 2023, doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00017.

P. D. Marsh, Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - Implications for health and disease, in BMC Oral Health, 2006. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14.

J. W. Costerton et al., Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections, Science (1979)., vol. 284, no. 5418, pp. 1318-1322., May 1999.

E. Polizzi et al., Antibacterial properties and side effects of chlorhexidinebased mouthwashes. A prospective, randomized clinical study, Journal of Osseointegration, vol. 12, no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.23805/JO.2019.12.01.20.

J. Pascual, J. Mira Otal, D. Torrent-Silla, M. Porcar, C. Vilanova, and F. Vivancos Cuadras, A mouthwash formulated with o-cymen-5-ol and zinc chloride specifically targets potential pathogens without impairing the native oral microbiome in healthy individuals, J. Oral Microbiol., vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2185962.

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF AN INNOVATIVE CHLORHEXIDINE-FREE CHILDREN’S MOUTHWASH AGAINST BENEFICIAL AND PATHOGENIC ORAL MICROORGANISMS

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License