CFD ANALYSIS OF HYDRODYNAMICS IN A STIRRED MIXING TANK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59957/jctm.v61.i6.2026.15Keywords:
Computational Fluid Dynamics; stirred tank; impeller geometry; Moving Reference Frame; Volume of Fluid; turbulence modelling; flow visualization.Abstract
Design and optimization of mixing tanks require the simultaneous consideration of multiple interdependent parameters, making experimental evaluation both costly and time-consuming. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides a powerful alternative for predicting flow behaviour and guiding design decisions. In this study, ANSYS Fluent was employed to investigate the hydrodynamics of a laboratory-scale stirred tank equipped with different impeller geometries. Two modelling approaches were implemented: the Moving Reference Frame (MRF) and the Sliding Mesh (SM) methods. Turbulence was described using the k-ω SST model, and in selected cases, a multiphase analysis was performed using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) approach. Four impellers - two straight-blade impellers with different height-to-diameter ratios, one 45° pitched-blade impeller, and a six-blade Rushton turbine - were evaluated under various operating conditions. The influence of impeller geometry, clearance, and the presence of baffles on the flow field was examined. Experimental visualization was performed to validate the numerical results. The simulations showed good agreement with experimental observations, confirming the reliability of CFD as a predictive and cost-effective tool for mixer design and performance assessment.
References
E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng, S. M. Kresta, Hoboken, Handbook of Industrial Mixing: Science and Practice, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2004.
M. Ge, J. Chen, L. Zhao, G. Zheng, Mixing Transport Mechanism of Three-Phase Particle Flow Based on CFD-DEM Coupling, Processes, 11, 6, 2023, 1619-1636.
P. Cullen, S. Bakalis, C. Sullivan, Advances in control of food mixing operations, Current Opinion in Food Science, 17, 2017, 89-93.
R. P. Utikar, V. V. Ranade, Intensifying Multiphase Reactions and Reactors: Strategies and Examples, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5, 5, 2017, 3607-3622.
A. Salho, D. Hamzeh, A Review of Stirred Tank Dynamics: Power Consumption, Mixing Time and Impeller Geometry, International Journal of Heat and Technology, 42, 3, 2024, 1081-1092.
L. Böhm, L. Hohl, C. Bliatsiou, M. Kraume, Multiphase Stirred Tank Bioreactors – New Geometrical Concepts and Scale-up Approaches, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 91, 12, 2019 1724-1746.
A. Reid, R. Rossi, C. Cottini, A. Benassi, CFD simulation of a Rushton turbine stirred-tank using open-source software with critical evaluation of MRF-based rotation modeling, Meccanica, 60, 2025, 1613-1637.
H. Ameur, Energy efficiency of different impellers in stirred tank reactors, Energy, 93, 2, 2015, 1980-1988.
G. Ascanio, B. Castro, E. Galindo, Measurement of Power Consumption in Stirred Vessels-A Review, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 82, 9, 2004, 1282-1290.
J.B. Joshi, N.K. Nere, C.V. Rane, B.N. Murthy, C.S. Mathpati, A.W. Patwardhan, V.V. Ranade, CFD simulation of stirred tanks: Comparison of turbulence models. Part I: Radial flow impellers. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 89, 1, 2011, 23-82.
J. Gimbun, C.D. Rielly, Z.K. Nagy, J.J. Derksen, Detached eddy simulation on the turbulent flow in a stirred tank. AIChE J., 58, 10, 2012, 3224-3241.
C. Mayorga, J. Morchain, A. Liné, Reconstruction of the 3D hydrodynamics in a baffled stirred tank using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, Chemical Engineering Science, 248, A, 2022, 117220.
13. X. Hu, A. Ilgun, A. Passalacqua, R. Fox, F. Bertola, M. Milosevic, F. Visscher, CFD simulations of stirred-tank reactors for gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid systems using OpenFOAM®, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 19, 2, 2021, 193-207.
M. Jaszczur, A. Młynarczykowska, A general review of the current development of mechanically agitated vessels, Processes, 8, 8, 2020, 982.
A. Ochieng, M.S. Onyango, CFD Simulation of Solids Suspension in Stirred Tanks: Review, Hem. ind., 64, 5, 2010, 365–374.
K. Youcef, Z. Driss, M. Foukrach, S. Rosa, T. Baki, A CFD investigation of the performance of stirred tanks, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., 90, 11, 2025, 1369–1382.
G. Mittal, R.I. Kikugawa, Computational fluid dynamics simulation of a stirred tank reactor, Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 20, 2021, 11015-11019.
A. Panunzi, M. Moroni, A. Mazzelli, M. Bravi, Industrial Case-Study-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Modeling of Stirred and Aerated Bioreactors, ACS Omega, 7, 29, 2022, 25152-25163.
R. Stoykova, D. Moutafchieva, D. Popova, V. Iliev, Gas hold-up prediction in gas-liquid stirred tank reactor using CFD simulation, J. Chem. Technol. Metall, 49, 5, 2014, 469-472.
D.A. Deglon, C.J. Meyer, CFD Modelling of Stirred Tanks: Numerical Considerations. Minerals Engineering, 19, 2006, 1059-1068.
ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, 2023.
H. Patil, A.K. Patel, H.J. Pant, A. Venu Vinod, CFD simulation model for mixing tank using multiple reference frame (MRF) impeller rotation, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 27, 2, 2021, 200–209.
F. L. Yang, S. J. Zhou, Free Surface Turbulent Flow in an Unbaffled Stirred Tank: Detached Eddy Simulation and VOF Study, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., 29, 3, 2015, 395–403.
S.L. Yeoh, G. Papadakis, M. Yianneskis, Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Characteristics in a Stirred Vessel Using the LES and RANS Approaches with the Sliding/Deforming Mesh Methodology, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 82, 7, 2004, 834-848.
R. Zadghaffari, J.S. Moghaddas, J. Revstedt, A mixing study in a double-Rushton stirred tank, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33, 7, 2009, 1240-1246.
M. Coroneo, G. Montante, A. Paglianti, F. Magelli, CFD prediction of fluid flow and mixing in stirred tanks: Numerical issues about the RANS simulations, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35, 10, 2011, 1959-1968.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
